Why Was Post-Downfall Sauron Unable To Take A Fair Form Again?

An illustration of Sauron's impotent spirit reaching out over Middle-earth, drawn by J.R.R. Tolkien. Why did Sauron lose the ability to assume a fair form again after he died in the Downfall of Númenor? The answer is simple, but the explanation is a bit complicated.

Q: Why Was Post-Downfall Sauron Unable To Take A Fair Form Again?

ANSWER: The short answer is that he was unable to focus his will sufficiently to control his self-incarnated form with such precision after his first death. I’ll cite the long answer below. But this question came from a group of questions submitted by a reader in June 2021:

It is said that Sauron could no longer take on a fair form after the Fall of Númenor. What do you think the reason behind that is? Was it a punishment of the Valar or Ilúvatar himself? Did he use up or spend all that was fair within in him in that body and he lacked the resources? With regards to that, wouldn’t he (and other beings) similarly run out of their capacity to create “evil forms” or is that considered a corruption of something good and thus not limited to any inherent capacity? Did he not just lose his capacity to appear fair or did he become less fair?

And now for the long answer.

The following citations are drawn from “Myths Transformed” in Morgoth’s Ring, specifically the section dealing with “Notes On Motives in The Silmarillion”. I’m clipping something I wrote many years ago in an online discussion. I provided some emphasis via italics at the time for reasons not relevant to your questions. But I’m not going to revise that markup. I’m correcting some typos from my original version.

The page references are to the first printing of the Houghton Mifflin editions of The History of Middle-earth (hardback), which may differ from other printings or editions of the books.

Begin Citation of Morgoth’s Ring

This passage was taken from section (iii) in “Notes On Motives In The Silmarillion”, and this section starts out with:

The Valar ‘fade’ and become more impotent, precisely in proportion as the shape and constitution of things becomes more defined and settled. The longer the Past, the more nearly defined the Future, and the less room for important change (untrammelled action, on a physical plane, that is not destructive in purpose). The Past, once ‘achieved’, has become part of the ‘Music in being’. Only Eru may or can alter the ‘Music’. The last major effort, of this demiurgic kind, made by the Valar was the lifting up of the range fo the Pelori to a great height….
(MORGOTH’S RING, p. 401)

The war was successful, and ruin was limited to the small (if beautiful) region of Beleriand. Morgoth was thus actually made captive in physical form [9], and in that form taken as a mere criminal to Aman and delivered to Namo Mandos as judge — and executioner. He was judged, and eventually taken out of the Blessed Realm and *executed*: that is killed like one of the Incarnates. It was then made plain (though it must have been understood before by Manwe and Namo) that, though he had ‘disseminated’ his power (his evil and possessive and rebellious will) far and wide into the matter of Arda, he had lost direct control of this, and all that ‘he’, as a surviving remnant of integral being, retained as ‘himself’ and under control was the terribly shrunken and reduced spirit that inhabited his self-imposed (but now beloved) body. When that body was destroyed he was weak and utterly ‘houseless’, and for that time at a loss and ‘unanchored’ as it were. We read that he was then thrust out into the Void [10]. That should mean that he was put outside Time and Space, outside Eä altogether; but if that were so this would imply a direct intervention of Eru (with or without the supplication of the Valar). It may however refer inaccurately (*) to the extrusion or flight of his spirit from Arda.”
(MORGOTH’S RING, p. 403)

The footnote denoted by (*) for the passage reads as:

Since the minds of Men (and even of the Elves) were inclined to confuse the ‘Void’, as a conception of the state of Not-being, outside Creation or Eä, with the conception of vast spaces within Eä, especially those conceived to lie all about the enisled ‘Kingdom of Arda’ (which we should probably call the Solar System).

Note 9 reads:

As, of course, had happened to Melkor long before, after the sack of Utumno.

Note 10 reads:

Cf. the conclusion of QS (V.332, $29): ‘But Morgoth himself the Gods thrust through the Door of Night into the Timeless Void, beyond the Walls of the World.’

Additionally, there is some information on Sauron in Note 11 referring to a passage a little later on in the essay:

…The Elves certainly held and taught that fëar or ‘spirits’ may grow of their own life (independently of the body), even as they may be hurt or healed, be diminished and renewed [11]. The dark spirit of Melkor’s ‘remainder’ might be expected, therefore, eventually and after long ages to increase again, even (as some held) to draw back into itself some of its formerly dissipated power. It would do this (even if Sauron could not) because of its relative greatness. It did not repent, or turn finally away from its obsession, but retained still relics of wisdom, so that it could still seek its object and indirectly, and not merely blindly. It would rest, seek to heal itself, distract itself by other thoughts and desires and devices — but all simply to recover enough strength to return to the attack on the Valar, and to its old obsession. As it grew again it would become, as it were, a dark shadow, brooding on the confines of Arda, and yearning towards it.

Note 11 reads:

The following was added marginally after the page was written:

If they do not sink below a certain level. Since no fëa can be annihilated, reduced to zero or not-existing, it is no[t] clear what is meant. Thus Sauron was said to have fallen below the point of ever recovering, though he had previously recovered. What is probably meant is that a ‘wicked’ spirit becomes fixed in a certain desire or ambition, and if it cannot repent then this desire becomes virtually its whole being. But the desire may be wholly the weakness it has fallen to, and it will then be unable to withdraw its attention from the unobtainable desire, even to attend to itself. It will then remain for ever in impotent desire or memory of desire.

Sauron and Other Ainur Compared to Melkor

Although Melkor had weakened himself by disseminating his native strength throughout Midle-earth to identify himself with it – that is, to “own” it – he was apparently exceptional, according to the above comments.

Sauron was said to be the greatest of his followers, more powerful (in the beginning) than other Ainur who became the Balrogs, Saruman, or Gandalf. And at the Council of Elrond, Gandalf said that if the One Ring were destroyed, “then [Sauron] will fall; and his fall will be so low that none can foresee his arising ever again. For he will lose the best part of the strength that was native to him in his beginning, and all that was made or begun with that power will crumble, and he will be maimed for ever, becoming a mere spirit of malice that gnaws itself in the shadows, but cannot again grow or take shape.”

So I have always inferred (and stand by this argument today) that if Sauron could not have self-reincarnated without the anchoring of the One Ring, then less powerful Ainur could not have self-incarnated again, either, if their bodies were slain. Hence, when Saruman was slain by Wormtongue, I believe he was so weakened as to be unable to self-incarnate again.

We don’t know that to be the case. The faithful Ainur like Gandalf who were slain weren’t trying to pervert the natural order the way Melkor and his followers had. So it’s conceivable that Gandalf could have returned to the Valar and eventually recomposed himself enough to take form again on his own. But I don’t think that was ever a realistic possibility in Tolkien’s mind.

He says in Letter No. 156 that Gandalf was “sent back” by Ilúvatar:

…He was sent by a mere prudent plan of the angelic Valar or governors; but Authority had taken up this plan and enlarged it, at the moment of its failure. ‘Naked I was sent back – for a brief time, until my task is done’. Sent back by whom, and whence? Not by the ‘gods’ whose business is only with this embodied world and its time; for he passed ‘out of thought and time’…

When Gandalf told Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli about his battle with the Balrog of Moria, he concluded by saying: “…Then darkness took me; and I strayed out of thought and time, and I wandered far on roads that I will not tell.”

It’s generally accepted (I think) that “out of thought and time” means he left Eä (Space and Time) because Tolkien says that Gandalf was healed, strengthened, given new authority, and sent back by Ilúvatar to complete the Valar’s failed plan.

Conclusion

So when you put all the above together, and consider that it was only because the One Ring possessed most of his native strength, it seems Tolkien was being quite transparent about Sauron’s inability to assume fair form again. He simply didn’t have the strength of will to heal himself (spiritually) enough to be able to self-incarnate any way he pleased.

Or, to put it another way, his fixation on becoming incarnate again made it impossible for him to concentrate on how he might achieve that. Unable to heal himself, Sauron would have diminished capacity to focus his thought each time he was slain, until finally all his strength was spent. Theoretically, despite Gandalf’s warning that Sauron would not fall again if he recovered the One Ring, he could have been slain again and again and as long as the Ring existed he would be able to slowly reconstitute himself in some kind of physical form.

Personally, I think that would have resulted in his becoming more monstrous and horrific and eventually he might not even be able to assume even the dark humanoid form Tolkien said he could still take on at the end of the Third Age. Maybe there could eventually have been a Blob-Sauron, still capable of doing great evil in the physical world – assuming the One Ring could have been kept from him, and he kept dying.

See Also

Did Sauron Die When the One Ring Was Destroyed?

How Many Times Was Sauron Slain?

How Does Death Work in Middle-earth?

Could Saruman Have Recincarnated Himself the Way Sauron Did?

Did Sauron Really Believe the One Ring Had Been Destroyed?

# # #

Have you read our other Tolkien and Middle-earth Questions and Answers articles?

[ Submit A Question ] Have a question you would like to see featured here? Use this form to contact Michael Martinez. If you think you see an error in an article and the comments are closed, you’re welcome to use the form to point it out. Thank you.
 
[ Once Daily Digest Subscriptions ]

Use this form to subscribe or manage your email subscription for blog updated notifcations.

You may read our GDPR-compliant Privacy Policy here.

7 comments

  1. I keep thinking of a conversation in the TV show Deadwood, which occurs between Seth Bullock (a sheriff) and Al Swearingen (a crime lord).

    Al: What did you know about me, Bullock, first we met? No concern for my feelings, huh?
    Seth: That you were a killer.
    Al: Certain facts show in the mug.

    The implication being, I think, that once you cross a certain moral boundary, you can no longer appear to be innocent, at least not to everyone. People can see it in your face that you’ve done something.

    It says in the Akallabêth that Sauron “could never again appear fair to the eyes of Men,” which I took to mean that he could never put on a fair form that was convincing. At best, he could look like the images of Annatar that often appear in places like DeviantArt – a form that’s beautiful, but clearly sinister. He crossed some kind of moral boundary in Numenor, and it was written on his face for all to see.

    Not to mention that he might not have had any desire to take on a fair form after the fall of Numenor, since he never again tried to infiltrate an enemy country.

    1. He did rule over some of the nations south and east of Gondor. It seems that he did so first by using the Ringwraiths as proxy rulers and also by ample demonstrations of his power and destructive potential and through and handing out forbidden knowledge. That seems to indicate that the path of trickery was now permanently closed to him. A fair form still would be useful, if he had one. But he no longer could rule, except by force. Power through terror is effective, but it’s never the only tool you want to use. Thus I surmise terror was indeed his only tool, and not by choice.

      This is all off-camera, so to speak. We never see how he recruited the Black Serpent and his men, or likely their distant ancestors, to his banner. But we know he was still very much building power through diplomacy and strategy. This he did when he was rebuilding before the War of the Last Alliance and even more during the Third Age. It was the only way he could regain his power base, by slowly building up his pawns and slowly whittling down his opponents. If he could have infiltrated an enemy country or seduced people through trickery, he most definitely would have gone for it. It would have made his stratagems much more effective.

      1. Good points. Perhaps I should have said that he never again tried to infiltrate an enemy country that we know of. Also, Sauron doesn’t seem to have spent too much time in power after the fall of Numenor. He ruled Mordor for the last 121 years of the Second Age, and he might have been politically active in the East in the Third Age during the Watchful Peace, which lasted around 400 years. But his “second reign” in Mordor (at the end of the Third Age) lasted only 66 years.

        I suspect that you’re right and that he did infiltrate the East. But I think the infiltration probably occurred during the third millennia of the Second Age, since the Tale of Years states, “c. 1800 Sauron extends his power eastwards.” He would have still been able to take fair form during that time.

  2. I don’t want to Uzi rule here, but I simply refuse to believe that the Ring was the last device Sauron built (as opposed to enchanted like the Watchers). Heck, even Saruman built a talking gate and a ring of power. So I think it would have been pretty easy for Sauron to make a few magic badges or something for his agents to bring to new or ex allies and wow them or at least convince them to join team Sauron for land and riches. So no real need for trickery, just bribery, seduction, and diplomacy. Need proof the offer is real? “Here. Touch this stone to one object in this room and turn it to gold.”. No need for fair faces there.

    1. “The Circle of Isengard was too strong for even the Lord of Morgul and his company to assail without great force of war. Therefore to his challenge and demands he receive only the answer of the voice of Saruman, that spoke by some art as though it came from the Gate itself.” (Unfinished Tales, “The Hunt for the Ring”)


Comments are closed.

You are welcome to use the contact form to share your thoughts about this article. We close comments after a few days to prevent comment spam.

We also welcome discussion at the J.R.R. Tolkien and Middle-earth Forum on SF-Fandom. Free registration is required to post.